Your consent banner
may not be protecting you.
A technical compliance audit and remediation service for B2B websites, built for legal teams who need verifiable evidence, not another policy template.
Stating a posture
is not proving it.
Most B2B websites accumulated their tracking surface over years: a tag manager set up by an agency that no longer works with you, pixels hardcoded in the theme, vendor scripts from trials that never became contracts. The banner displays, a tracker fires, and the platform logs the event as permitted. When someone asks you to prove that collection stopped before consent, you have a privacy policy and a banner, but no network trace and no clean-state test.
- Seven-layer audit: tracking surface, consent mechanism, data flow, forms, policy documentation, operational posture, and real-time and typed-content capture.
- Jurisdiction map identifying which data protection laws may apply to your website, based on actual visitor geography.
- Findings register with severity classification, suitable for board presentation or outside-counsel review.
- Four-state verification matrix: no consent, declined, accepted and authenticated, with network-level evidence for each state.
- Technical evidence document formatted for attorney review, time-stamped and reproducible, for use as directed by your counsel.
With a 30-minute scoping call. EPIC identifies the jurisdictions that may apply to your website, assesses your current consent mechanism and tells you whether the starting point is a diagnostic or direct remediation.
A B2B fintech company received a written directive from counsel requiring immediate remediation. EPIC ran a complete diagnostic, remediated in two technical waves and delivered the evidence document within 24 hours. Before: 9 cookies and about 30 trackers firing before any visitor interaction. After: no cookies and no trackers firing before consent.
Four stages, from diagnostic to posture.
Diagnostic
Clean-state browser enumeration across all seven layers, producing a findings register classified by technical risk.
Triage
Each finding is sequenced into a remediation roadmap. Critical exposures go straight to your counsel, without waiting for the report.
Remediation
Technical fixes in waves (settings, tag manager, CMS, policy), with verification testing after each wave and the evidence document at close.
Posture
Quarterly re-audit, subprocessor monitoring and annual policy review, for clients who engage ongoing coverage.
Frequently asked questions
A CMP is the policy layer; Compliance Shield verifies whether it works. The most common finding is a sound CMP configuration that a hardcoded legacy tracker bypasses: the banner works, and the tracker was never routed through it. Four-state verification produces the record a CMP subscription does not.
No. A legal audit reviews what your policies say. Compliance Shield documents what your website actually does, with network-level evidence. EPIC's work product is designed to be produced to counsel, not to replace their legal opinion.
Yes. EPIC produces the technical input, and your counsel produces the legal output. EPIC does not provide legal opinions, co-sign legal positions or represent you before regulators.
A named person on your team executes, and EPIC prepares each step and verifies the result. EPIC does not request write credentials to your systems.
Whether a given law applies to your website, and the exposure that creates, must be assessed by counsel qualified in that jurisdiction. Compliance Shield delivers the technical evidence that assessment relies on.
Find out what your website
does before consent.
In 30 minutes, EPIC identifies the jurisdictions that may apply to your website and points to the right starting point. No sales pitch.
EPIC Digital is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Compliance Shield delivers technical work product formatted for attorney review. Decisions about legal obligations, exposure and strategy should be made with qualified counsel.